Exclusive New Research from the Telecom Leader

Survey stats * market share * real world deployments * and more

Now with two ways to buy…

      Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines   
   Comments

Breaking Mexico's monopoly: U.S. giants back affiliate carriers

more on the topic

More Related Articles

While monopolies slowly break down inside the U.S., carriers and regulators face a different fight outside the country. Troubles brewing in Mexico last week underscored why the globalization of telecommunications still is far off.

Early last week, Mexican telephone operator Alestra - a venture formed by AT&T, Mexican banking concern Bancomer and conglomerate ALFA - said negotiations between Telmex and other carriers conducted by the Mexican Federal Telecommunications Commission, Cofetel, had broken off.

Under dispute are the interconnection fees that Telmex charges competitive carriers. Long-distance operator Avantel, which is 45% owned by MCI WorldCom, also was taking part in the suspended talks.

In a statement, Alestra, the second largest carrier in Mexico, said its seeks "healthy competition through banning predatory practices and crossed subsidies, the adoption of real cost-based interconnection fees that are consistent with international references and the exclusion of other anti-competitive practices."

"Competitive carriers in Mexico have essentially been mugged by Telmex, the dominant telecommunications carrier, which has used its monopoly position to maintain its stranglehold on Mexican consumers," said John Stupka, president of ventures and alliances for MCI WorldCom.

MCI WorldCom accuses Telmex of engaging in a "classic price squeeze" by not offering a spread between retail and wholesale prices. Competing carriers are charged interconnection fees that are higher than the retail price Telmex offers consumers, Stupka said. Interconnection fees are the rates incumbent carriers charge others to access their local phone lines. Telmex owns about 11 million fixed-line connections to homes and business in Mexico.

MCI WorldCom also claimed Telmex used its control of facilities to hinder competitors' ability to provision lines and circuits. But the most damning accusation U.S. carriers have leveled against Mexico is that Cofetel is ineffectual and uninterested in opening the Mexican market to local and foreign competitors.

"The Mexican government has been repeatedly urged by U.S. government agencies, international private industry groups and independent researchers to meet its international commitments," Stupka said. "Despite this chorus, the regulator has been more concerned with the financial health of Telmex."

When talks broke down on March 27, Cofetel issued a statement that it started regulatory proceedings to prevent monopolistic behavior by Telmex. Cofetel would impose standards in relation to prices, quality of service and fair competition, the statement said. But U.S. carriers claim the same promises already have been made and Cofetel has failed because of numerous court injunctions won by Telmex.

MCI WorldCom executives recently met with the U.S. Trade Representative, which is set to issue its annual report on competitive practices in telecommunications worldwide. AT&T and MCI WorldCom have lobbied the USTR about the Telmex problem, and the USTR reportedly is deciding whether to take the conflict to the World Trade Organization for arbitration.

"We're convinced [the report] is going to say there are serious problems down there," Stupka said.

The FCC also has become involved. In January, the FCC fined Telmex's U.S. resale operations $100,000 for violating long-distance agreements by refusing connections in Mexico. The company has not paid the fine, and the matter still is pending before the FCC.

Mexico is not the only international market where interconnection fees are straining international relations. The USTR also has been vocal about interconnection rates charged by NTT, which controls more than 90% of the local lines into Japanese homes.

The whole matter begs the question of how far the influence of U.S. regulators should extend into international markets. At least one analyst said regulators have overextended their authority.

For example, the FCC "has virtually mandated reduction of settlement rates, when over time, the free market will lower them, said Ron Cowles, principal analyst at Dataquest. "The rates should come down, but there are other things you can do besides arm-twisting. Nobody has the chutzpa to combat it."

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.

  • Telephony Content


blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Updates Via Email
  • Telephony Content

related resources

popular articles

Webcasts

WEBCAST

Reduce Customer Churn and Cut Costs Webcast | July 22, 2009

Learn the best practices for online customer billing and service – how to implement a paperless bill, drive traffic to your web site, improve customer service.

REGISTER NOW

White Papers

WHITE PAPER

Automated End-to-End Managed Service Delivery. Sponsored by Ciena.

Ciena’s industry-leading CoreDirector Multiservice Optical Switch with FastMesh® has been used for efficient and robust core switching in the world’s largest networks. DOWNLOAD NOW

Podcasts

PODCAST

Wikimedia explores the phone as encyclopedia

Kul Wadhwa, head of business development, Wikimedia Foundation, discusses with senior editor Kevin Fitchard the Wikipedia’s future on the mobile phone. LISTEN

Blogs

BLOG

I-feature: Readers respond

As promised, a key component of Telephony’s new Interactive Featureis reader participation READ

E-Books

Telephony May Special Section: Carrier Ethernet

No slowdown in sight!

Read how carrier Ethernet is defying the slow economy. DOWNLOAD NOW!

  • Telephony Content
  • Telephony Content

commentary

Carol Wilson
Energy bill should energize change

June 29, 2009

Read Now

Carol Wilson
Steve Hilton
Ask Steve

June 29, 2009

Read Now

Steve Hilton

Recent Comments

Follow comments on Telephony

More ways to stay informed

Find us on Facebook

follow us on twitter

Browse Issues

  • June 1, 2009
  • October 1, 2008
  • April 1, 2009
  • March 1, 2009
  • February 1, 2009
  • January 1, 2009
  • December 1, 2008