Exclusive New Research from the Telecom Leader

Survey stats * market share * real world deployments * and more

Now with two ways to buy…

      Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines   
   Comments

Cogent courts cable

more on the topic

More Related Articles

Cogent Communications is launching a U.S. initiative to attract cable companies as customers for its gigabit Ethernet service. The service provider, which has already captured major cable company business in Europe and Canada, believes its low-cost, high-capacity network can enable cable companies to compete more effectively as they add bandwidth to their cable modem services to battle DSL’s growing popularity.

The initiative includes an opportunity to use Cogent’s network without signing a term contract--a strategy that succeeded in landing Cogent about 400 university customers in the U.S., said David Schaeffer, CEO.

“With the universities, we offered them a chance to use our service, and many started out using us as a backup,” he commented. “Now we are their primary provider. This is a chance for the cable companies to try the service and get comfortable with us as a service provider, and understand the quality of what we are providing.”

Cogent is going into the market as a low-cost provider--its $10 a megabit rate is a fraction of what others are currently charging, according to Schaeffer. The cost factor is becoming more important to cable companies as they up the bandwidth on their cable modem services to 3 Mb/s and higher. Comcast, for example, just announced a 6 Mb/s service.

“As the amount of the bandwidth given to the customer goes up, then their upstream bandwidth purchase becomes a higher percentage of their costs,” he said. “We think we can entice them with lower-cost options.”

Cogent serves 90% of the cable operators in Spain and 60% to 70% of cable operators in France and Germany, Schaeffer said, but only has a few small cable operators as customers in the U.S. One reason for that, he explained, is that Comcast and Time-Warner, two of the largest cable operators, are captive customers of AT&T and AOL, respectively.

In the wake of the Brand X decision, which assured cable companies they would not have to open their cable modem networks to other ISPs, the cable companies “are putting renewed emphasis on their own broadband products,” Schaeffer said. “We think this is a good time to go after their business.”

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.

  • Telephony Content


blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Updates Via Email
  • Telephony Content

related resources

popular articles

Webcasts

WEBCAST

Reduce Customer Churn and Cut Costs Webcast | July 22, 2009

Learn the best practices for online customer billing and service – how to implement a paperless bill, drive traffic to your web site, improve customer service.

REGISTER NOW

White Papers

WHITE PAPER

Automated End-to-End Managed Service Delivery. Sponsored by Ciena.

Ciena’s industry-leading CoreDirector Multiservice Optical Switch with FastMesh® has been used for efficient and robust core switching in the world’s largest networks. DOWNLOAD NOW

Podcasts

PODCAST

Wikimedia explores the phone as encyclopedia

Kul Wadhwa, head of business development, Wikimedia Foundation, discusses with senior editor Kevin Fitchard the Wikipedia’s future on the mobile phone. LISTEN

Blogs

BLOG

I-feature: Readers respond

As promised, a key component of Telephony’s new Interactive Featureis reader participation READ

E-Books

Telephony May Special Section: Carrier Ethernet

No slowdown in sight!

Read how carrier Ethernet is defying the slow economy. DOWNLOAD NOW!

  • Telephony Content
  • Telephony Content

commentary

Carol Wilson
Energy bill should energize change

June 29, 2009

Read Now

Carol Wilson
Steve Hilton
Ask Steve

June 29, 2009

Read Now

Steve Hilton

Recent Comments

Follow comments on Telephony

More ways to stay informed

Find us on Facebook

follow us on twitter

Browse Issues

  • June 1, 2009
  • October 1, 2008
  • April 1, 2009
  • March 1, 2009
  • February 1, 2009
  • January 1, 2009
  • December 1, 2008