Exclusive New Research from the Telecom Leader

Survey stats * market share * real world deployments * and more

Now with two ways to buy…

      Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines   
   Comments

Embarq rejected higher offer to do CenturyTel deal

more on the topic

More Related Articles

When Embarq accepted CenturyTel’s $5.8-billion acquisition offer last month, it rejected a slightly higher offer from another company, according to regulatory filings made by CenturyTel last week.

CenturyTel’s offer was one of two all-stock transaction proposals submitted to Embarq on October 25. CenturyTel’s offer valued Embarq at $40.42 per share, a 36% premium, while the other bidder offered $40.86, a 37% premium. Embarq took the lower offer.

Embarq listed multiple justifications for its choice, including about $400 million in annual synergies (it’s unknown what synergies the other bidder would have seen) as well as CenturyTel’s use of 700 MHz spectrum.

The Embarq/CenturyTel deal followed months of discussions among various parties about a host of possible business combinations. In addition to Embarq and itself, CenturyTel mentioned in filings at least five other companies that engaged in some form of serious combination discussions with either company this year. On more than one occasion, CenturyTel explored the option of acquiring Embarq in conjunction with another company; that company’s participation was ruled out in September, however, as Embarq decided that a deal with it would take too long to finalize.

In mid-October, Embarq invited its two most serious suitors to submit all-stock offers. (At that point, turbulence in the financial markets had made it difficult to imagine securing enough capital for a cash-based deal.) Two days later, CenturyTel offered Embarq $41.94 per share, which was at the time a 24% premium. The following week, the other bidder offered Embarq two options: One was a part-cash, part-stock deal wherein Embarq would get $11.50 in cash and a fixed number of the acquirer’s shares for every Embarq share, which combined to value Embarq at $46 per share, a 32% premium. The other option was an all-stock offer of $44 per share, a 26% premium. Embarq replied that it was only interested in all-stock deals. But even the lower all-stock deal was higher than that from CenturyTel.

Meanwhile, the market was being ravaged by the macroeconomy, and the stocks of each company were falling.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.

  • Telephony Content


blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Updates Via Email
  • Telephony Content

related resources

popular articles

Webcasts

WEBCAST

Reduce Customer Churn and Cut Costs Webcast | July 22, 2009

Learn the best practices for online customer billing and service – how to implement a paperless bill, drive traffic to your web site, improve customer service.

REGISTER NOW

White Papers

WHITE PAPER

Automated End-to-End Managed Service Delivery. Sponsored by Ciena.

Ciena’s industry-leading CoreDirector Multiservice Optical Switch with FastMesh® has been used for efficient and robust core switching in the world’s largest networks. DOWNLOAD NOW

Podcasts

PODCAST

Wikimedia explores the phone as encyclopedia

Kul Wadhwa, head of business development, Wikimedia Foundation, discusses with senior editor Kevin Fitchard the Wikipedia’s future on the mobile phone. LISTEN

Blogs

BLOG

I-feature: Readers respond

As promised, a key component of Telephony’s new Interactive Featureis reader participation READ

E-Books

Telephony May Special Section: Carrier Ethernet

No slowdown in sight!

Read how carrier Ethernet is defying the slow economy. DOWNLOAD NOW!

  • Telephony Content
  • Telephony Content

commentary

Carol Wilson
Energy bill should energize change

June 29, 2009

Read Now

Carol Wilson
Steve Hilton
Ask Steve

June 29, 2009

Read Now

Steve Hilton

Recent Comments

Follow comments on Telephony

More ways to stay informed

Find us on Facebook

follow us on twitter

Browse Issues

  • June 1, 2009
  • October 1, 2008
  • April 1, 2009
  • March 1, 2009
  • February 1, 2009
  • January 1, 2009
  • December 1, 2008