Exclusive New Research from the Telecom Leader

Survey stats * market share * real world deployments * and more

Now with two ways to buy…

      Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines   
   Comments

Embarq uses ‘naked DSL’ to slow line loss

more on the topic

More Related Articles

Embarq began offering so-called “naked DSL” service this month as a tool to retain customers who no longer want landline voice service.

Two weeks ago, the tier-two carrier began offering DSL by itself—with no other services bundled in, such as voice—but only to customers who call Embarq requesting service cancellation.

“We only offer ‘naked DSL’ as a customer-retention tool,” an Embarq spokesperson said. “Our strategy is to integrate our offerings so that they work together.”

Embarq’s naked DSL is $34.95 per month for speeds “up to” 1.5 megabits per second, while its bundled DSL is $24.95 per month (for just the DSL part of the bundle).

This tactic is the latest effort from Embarq to slow its access line loss. The company has been losing access lines at the rate of about 6% per year since it split off from Sprint. Embarq resells wireless service from its former parent and has introduced a range of fixed-mobile convergence applications to try to convince customers of the value of keeping both a landline and a mobile phone.

When asked why Embarq didn’t start offering naked DSL earlier than this month, the spokesperson said, “Our strategy is to integrate and bundle our service offerings…so offering one standalone product like [high-speed Internet] isn't a strategic fit. However, we would prefer to keep a customer for one service should they decide to discontinue their home phone service, rather than lose the customer altogether.”

AT&T was required by the Federal Communications Commission to offer standalone DSL (at 768 kb/s for under $20 monthly) as a condition for its merger with BellSouth. A company spokesperson today said AT&T will launch such an offering by the end of this year. Meanwhile, the carrier began offering a DSL/wireless bundle, without landline voice, in some markets this fall, starting at $60 per month (including $24 for DSL). Having had success with that offering in early trials, AT&T is working to make it available throughout its service territory "in coming months," the company said.

A spokesperson for Windstream—another local incumbent that, like Embarq, was spun off from its wireless parent—said the company does not offer naked DSL.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.

  • Telephony Content


blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Updates Via Email
  • Telephony Content

related resources

popular articles

Webcasts

WEBCAST

Reduce Customer Churn and Cut Costs Webcast | July 22, 2009

Learn the best practices for online customer billing and service – how to implement a paperless bill, drive traffic to your web site, improve customer service.

REGISTER NOW

White Papers

WHITE PAPER

Automated End-to-End Managed Service Delivery. Sponsored by Ciena.

Ciena’s industry-leading CoreDirector Multiservice Optical Switch with FastMesh® has been used for efficient and robust core switching in the world’s largest networks. DOWNLOAD NOW

Podcasts

PODCAST

Wikimedia explores the phone as encyclopedia

Kul Wadhwa, head of business development, Wikimedia Foundation, discusses with senior editor Kevin Fitchard the Wikipedia’s future on the mobile phone. LISTEN

Blogs

BLOG

I-feature: Readers respond

As promised, a key component of Telephony’s new Interactive Featureis reader participation READ

E-Books

Telephony May Special Section: Carrier Ethernet

No slowdown in sight!

Read how carrier Ethernet is defying the slow economy. DOWNLOAD NOW!

  • Telephony Content
  • Telephony Content

commentary

Carol Wilson
Energy bill should energize change

June 29, 2009

Read Now

Carol Wilson
Steve Hilton
Ask Steve

June 29, 2009

Read Now

Steve Hilton

Recent Comments

Follow comments on Telephony

More ways to stay informed

Find us on Facebook

follow us on twitter

Browse Issues

  • June 1, 2009
  • October 1, 2008
  • April 1, 2009
  • March 1, 2009
  • February 1, 2009
  • January 1, 2009
  • December 1, 2008